Vadyba / Journal of Management (ISSN 1648-7974)
Vadyba. / Journal of Management – Ethics Policy.
Section Policies
Original Articles
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- must use CrossCheck to screen for an unoriginal material before the peer-review process and at any point during the peer-review process; keep and promote ethical policies of the journal.
- keep and promote ethical policies of the journal.
- article matches published in the Vadyba / Journal of Management are checked via the iThenticate matching system.
- the author of the article must send a letter of guarantee confirming and guaranteeing that the article will not be published in another scientific journal.
- if the article finds overlaps of more than 20%, the article will not be published.
- Vadyba / Journal of Management adheres to the description of publishing ethics.
- ensure the confidentiality of the review process for both sides involved.
- do not disclose any information regarding a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding Author, Reviewers, potential Reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the Publisher, when appropriate.
- make a decision on publication or rejecting the paper according to the scientific importance/quality, interest to readers, Reviewers’ comments and the related legal requirements (i.e. plagiarism, breach of copyright, etc.);
- communicate politely with the authors about their paper;
- preserve anonymity of reviewers.
- remove an identification of the authorship before the manuscripts are submitted for a critical review process.
- reserve the right to make minor amendments to the text or return it back to the author for further revision.
- reserve the right to refuse the manuscript without the review process due to inappropriate quality of the manuscript, a different focus or violation of legal requirements (i.e. plagiarism, breach of copyright, etc.).
- Does the paper have clear aims and objectives / research questions that can be achieved within the scope of the journal paper?
- Does the paper make a contribution to knowledge?
- Is the work suitably grounded in the literature to justify its contribution and frame the analysis/evaluation? Is the research/evaluation methodology justified, clear and appropriate? (Including ethical
- considerations / approval where appropriate)
- Does the analysis/ evaluation have a clear flow and logical argument?
- Does the analysis/evaluation link to an appropriate discussion and conclusions?
- Is it presented in a way which is suitable for the journal’s international audience?
- Accept manuscript (i.e. no need for any revision).
- Accept after revision (i.e. accepted if the author makes the requested revisions).
- Revise and resubmit (i.e. accepted or rejected after revisions have been made – paper will be sent out for another peer review round).
- Reject manuscript (i.e. if the manuscript is not sufficiently developed for publication).
- See comments (i.e. if the reviewer cannot choose from any of the above).